The All India Football Federation (AIFF) has come under fire following its recent attempts to engage its executive committee (ExCo) regarding the organization of the Indian Super League (ISL). Critics highlight a lack of adequate notice and time for members to provide input. On a Wednesday, a notice from the AIFF’s Deputy Secretary General, M. Satyanarayan, requested written feedback by 5 p.m. that day. Shortly before this deadline, ExCo members were informed about a Zoom meeting scheduled for 7 p.m., leaving many unable to participate. This sudden change created confusion and dissatisfaction among the members. The letter, which had been sent earlier, referenced an impending report from Hon’ble Justice L. N. Rao, who is set to present findings related to the selection of a commercial partner for the AIFF’s commercial rights handled by KPMG. The letter also suggested that the Supreme Court could demand clarity on an alternate plan for the ISL's organization following Justice Rao’s report. Previously, the AIFF had issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for a commercial partner to manage the ISL for 15 years, offering ₹37.4 crore annually. However, after the extended deadline on November 7, it was reported that no bids were submitted. Meanwhile, the Bid Evaluation Committee met to incorporate feedback from the ExCo into the report due to the Supreme Court. Nevertheless, some ExCo members expressed concerns over the lack of unity and communication within the federation, indicating an unclear future for both the ISL and I-League. This discontent has resulted in several top clubs, including Kerala Blasters and Mohun Bagan Super Giant, pausing operations, and prompting players to issue statements calling for an urgent resolution to the uncertainties surrounding men’s football in India. Overall, the AIFF's mismanagement and internal communication issues have stifled men's football activities in the country, leaving stakeholders anxious about the direction the sport is heading.